With this mass support and the mentality that people had that they could be successful in not only the large-scale revolution, but also in more focused agendas, the middle class began gravitating towards interest groups and unions. People spoke "most loudly as constituents of particular social and economic interests" with a focus on occupational concerns. Numerous interest groups were established, such as the socialist Free Trade Union which tripled in size compared to pre-war participation.
This huge increase in political activity by the middle-class upset the norms of previous society and government. Which such active participants who were focused on certain specific issues, the right wing lost huge amounts of support and representation in the Reichstag. This revolution gave a much more recognized voice to the middle-class through their ability to join together in small interest groups with direct focuses to upset the social norms of pre-war Germany.
Fritzsche defnitely points to the rise in middle-class activism and their seeming embrace of interest groups and organizations as evidence of their willingness to commit to Weimar and as we saw, they did get involved in the political process and mobilize to defend their interests. However, I think the real question remains to what extent Weimar truly "upset the social norms of pre-war Germany" and to what extent it was a brief interlude. Did power really ever shitf or did it remain with the aristocracy until they surrendered it to Hitler? Was Weimar ever viable or was it doomed to collapse?
ReplyDelete